On the Restriction of Deligne-lusztig Characters
نویسنده
چکیده
results of Hagedorn gave me the courage to attempt such calculations for general groups and to obtain closed multiplicity formulas for orthogonal groups. It is a pleasure to thank Dick Gross for initiating the work in [12] which led to this paper, for helpful remarks on an earlier version, and for aquainting me with Hagedorn’s thesis. The referee read the original version of this paper with care and insight, made valuable comments and simplified some of the arguments. In particular, the proof of Lemma 3.1 given below is due to the referee and is much shorter than the original one. Some general notation: The cardinality of a finite set X is denoted by |X|. Equivalence classes are generally denoted by [ · ], sometimes with ornamentation. If g is an element of a group G, we write Ad(g) for the conjugation map Ad(g) : x → gxg−1, and also write T := gTg−1 for a subgroup T ⊂ G. The center of G is denoted Z(G) and the centralizer of g ∈ G is denoted CG(g). We write 〈 , 〉H for the pairing on the space of class functions on a finite group H, for which the irreducible characters of H are an orthonormal basis. If G,G′ ⊃ H are finite overgroups of H and ψ, ψ′ are class functions on G,G′ respectively, then 〈ψ, ψ〉H is understood to mean 〈ψ|H , ψ|H〉H , where |H denotes restriction to H. 2. Remarks on maximal tori Let G be a connected reductive algebraic F-group. We assume G is defined over f and has Frobenius F . If T is a maximal torus in G we denote its normalizer in G by NG(T ) and write WG(T ) = NG(T )/T for the Weyl group of T in G. If T is F -stable, we have W (T ) = NG(T ) /T , by the Lang-Steinberg theorem. The reduction formula for Deligne-Lusztig characters (recalled in section 4 below) involves a sum over the following kind of subset of G . Fix an F -stable maximal torus T ⊂ G, and let s be a semisimple element in G . We must sum over the set NG(s, T ) := {γ ∈ G : s ∈ T}. Note that NG(s, T ) , if nonempty, is a union of Gs ×NG(T ) double cosets, where Gs := CG(s) is the identity component of the centralizer CG(s) of s in G. To say that s ∈ T is to say that T ⊂ Gs, so determining the Gs × NG(T ) double cosets in NG(s, T ) amounts to determining the Gs -conjugacy classes of F -stable maximal tori in Gs which are contained in a given G -conjugacy class. Such classes of tori are parameterized by twisted conjugacy classes in Weyl groups of Gs and G. The aim of this section is to parameterize the Gs × NG(T ) double cosets in NG(s, T ) in terms of the fiber of a natural map between twisted conjugacy classes in the Weyl groups of Gs and G. This parameterization will be fundamental to our later calculations with Deligne-Lusztig characters. We begin by recalling the classification of F -stable maximal tori in G. See [5, chap. 3] for more details in what follows. Fix an F -stable maximal torus T0 in G contained in an F -stable Borel subgroup of G, and abbreviate NG = NG(T0), WG = WG(T0). License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see http://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use ON THE RESTRICTION OF DELIGNE-LUSZTIG CHARACTERS 577 Let T (G) denote the set of all F -stable maximal tori in G. Then T (G) is a finite union of G -orbits. For any T ∈ T (G), let [T ]G := {T : γ ∈ G } denote the G -orbit of T . There is g ∈ G such that T = T0. Since T is F -stable, we have g−1F (g) ∈ NG. This gives an element w := g−1F (g)T0 ∈ WG. The map Ad(g)t = gtg−1 is an f-isomorphism Ad(g) : (T0, wF ) −→ (T, F ), where the second component denotes the action of Frobenius under an f-structure. For any finite group A with F -action, we let H(F,A) denote the set of F conjugacy classes in A. These are the orbits of the action of A on itself via (a, b) → abF (a)−1. Let [b] ∈ H(F,A) denote the F -conjugacy class of an element b ∈ A. For g, T, w as above, the F -conjugacy class of w is independent of the choice of g. Hence we have a well-defined class cl(T,G) := [w] ∈ H(F,WG). For each ω ∈ H(F,WG), the set Tω(G) := {T ∈ T (G) : cl(T,G) = ω} is a single G -orbit in T (G), and all G -orbits are of this form. Thus, the partition of the set of F -stable maximal tori into G -orbits is given by T (G) = ∐
منابع مشابه
Deligne-Lusztig restriction of a Gelfand-Graev module
Using Deodhar’s decomposition of a double Schubert cell, we study the regular representations of finite groups of Lie type arising in the cohomology of Deligne-Lusztig varieties associated to tori. We deduce that the Deligne-Lusztig restriction of a Gelfand-Graev module is a shifted Gelfand-Graev module. INTRODUCTION Let G be a connected reductive algebraic group defined over an algebraic closu...
متن کاملOn Endoscopic Transfer of Deligne–lusztig Functions
In this paper we prove the fundamental lemma for Deligne–Lusztig functions. Namely, for every Deligne–Lusztig function φ on a p-adic group G we write down an explicit linear combination φ of Deligne–Lusztig functions on an endoscopic group H such that φ and φ have “matching orbital integrals”. In particular, we prove a conjecture of Kottwitz [Ko4]. More precisely, we do it under some mild restr...
متن کاملDeligne–lusztig Constructions for Division Algebras and the Local Langlands Correspondence, Ii
In 1979, Lusztig proposed a cohomological construction of supercuspidal representations of reductive p-adic groups, analogous to Deligne–Lusztig theory for finite reductive groups. In this paper we establish a new instance of Lusztig’s program. Precisely, let X be the Deligne–Lusztig (ind-pro-)scheme associated to a division algebra D over a non-Archimedean local field K of positive characteris...
متن کاملOn the Connectedness of Deligne-lusztig Varieties
We give a criterion which determines when a union of one-dimensional Deligne-Lusztig varieties has a connected closure. We obtain a new, short proof of the connectedness criterion for Deligne-Lusztig varieties due to Lusztig.
متن کاملAffine Deligne–lusztig Varieties at Infinite Level (preliminary Version)
Part 1. Two analogues of Deligne–Lusztig varieties for p-adic groups 5 2. Affine Deligne–Lusztig varieties at infinite level 5 2.1. Preliminaries 5 2.2. Deligne–Lusztig sets/varieties 7 2.3. Affine Deligne–Lusztig varieties and covers 8 2.4. Scheme structure 9 3. Case G = GLn, b basic, w Coxeter 12 3.1. Notation 12 3.2. Basic σ-conjucacy classes. Isocrystals 12 3.3. The admissible subset of Vb ...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Deligne-lusztig Theory
We give an informal introduction to the theory of Deligne-Lusztig which gives all the irreducible representations of reductive groups over finite fields [DL], with an emphasis on the geometry of the Deligne-Lusztig variety. Disclaimer: by no means complete! Comments welcome / use at your own risk!
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005